header2
Nagel, Williams and Fischer take different positions on the desirability of deat
Home » philosophy  »  Nagel, Williams and Fischer take different positions on the desirability of deat
Nagel, Williams and Fischer take different positions on the desirability of deat
Nagel, Williams and Fischer take different positions on the desirability of death versus an immortal existence. Nagel claims that death is always bad because it abruptly cancels the indefinitely extensive good of continued life and its enjoyments. Williams, on the other hand, claims that death can’t be as bad as it seems, since an immortal existence has its own miseries. Finally, Fischer disagrees with Williams’ claim concerning immortal existence and defends the attractiveness of living forever. Please compare and contrast two of these three authors. First, briefly summarize each author’s position and point to any similarities between their two views. Then discuss where the disagreement lies between the authors’ positions. Finally, and most importantly, argue for which view you find more tenable!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Click=Order Your Paper Now !